m (spam) |
|||
| (39 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | At [[Technical conferences]], there are often presentations which contain suggestive or pornographic content, almost always featuring women. |
+ | At [[Technical conferences]], there are often presentations which contain suggestive or [[Pornography|pornographic]] content, almost always featuring women. This is an example of a [[sexualized environment]] which can be unwelcoming to women. |
| − | It's not just women who are made uncomfortable, either. |
+ | It's not just women who are made uncomfortable, either. Child attendees and any accompanying adults may find this unwelcome (or frightening, depending on the content) too, and men often also for various reasons do not want to view sexual material. Anyone attending the event in a work context — geek technical conferences often have attendees who are only geeks on work time — will be unprepared for material that wouldn't be welcome when described in their work environment. |
== Examples == |
== Examples == |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
* [[CouchDB talk]], [[Golden Gate Ruby Conference]] 2009 |
* [[CouchDB talk]], [[Golden Gate Ruby Conference]] 2009 |
||
* [[Flashbelt slide show]], [[Flashbelt]] 2009 |
* [[Flashbelt slide show]], [[Flashbelt]] 2009 |
||
| + | * [[EMACS virgins joke]], [[Gran Canaria Desktop Summit]], 2009 |
||
| + | * [[AmazonLISAFail]] |
||
| + | * Boxee Box Unveiling, 2009 |
||
| + | * [[Casecamp boobies incident]], 2010 |
||
| + | * [[Benevolent dictator incident]], [[Wikimania]] 2012 |
||
| + | * CanSecWest security conference: |
||
| + | :* Jan Krissler's presentation on biohacking, cropped porno gratuituously illustrating how hi-res photographs can be used to bypass retina scans.<ref>[http://www.tomsguide.com/us/photos-biometrics-csw,news-20684.html High-Resolution Photos Fool Fingerprint, Iris Readers on Tom's Guide]</ref> |
||
| + | :* Patrick Wardle (Synack) presentation, valid tech security terms sexualized with "relevant" images of women's body parts or sexual acts. |
||
| + | |||
| + | == Discussion == |
||
| + | Discussion of the general issue of sexualized presentations (discussion of specific incidents should be added to the corresponding page) |
||
| + | |||
| + | *[http://infotrope.net/blog/2009/06/16/the-porny-presentation-bingo-card/ The Porny Presentation Bingo Card] ([[User:Skud|Skud]]'s blog) |
||
| + | *[http://blogs.tedneward.com/2009/06/14/The+Quotcontroversyquot+Continues.aspx The "controversy" continues] |
||
| + | *[http://ubuntulinuxtipstricks.blogspot.com/2009/06/shedding-some-light-on-recent-trend.html Shedding Some Light on a Recent Trend] |
||
== Justifications/excuses == |
== Justifications/excuses == |
||
| Line 24: | Line 39: | ||
* That the presentation was intended as [[Sexist humor|humour]] |
* That the presentation was intended as [[Sexist humor|humour]] |
||
* That tech culture revels in being [[Rebellion|anti-establishment and unprofessional]] |
* That tech culture revels in being [[Rebellion|anti-establishment and unprofessional]] |
||
| − | * That there weren't any women in the audience anyway |
+ | * That there [[Invisibility|weren't any women]] in the audience anyway |
| − | * That if you didn't want to see it, you didn't have to attend |
+ | * That if you didn't want to see it, [[You don't have to read it|you didn't have to attend]] |
== When is sexual material appropriate? == |
== When is sexual material appropriate? == |
||
| + | Some talks are about sexual or related ''topics'', and in this case sexual material is appropriate. Some geek examples might include: |
||
| − | There are a couple of special cases of sexual content. One is using sexual content when a talk's focus is on censorship or similar. However, one of the key anti-censorship arguments is that consenting adults should have the right to view sexual material at a time and place of their ''choosing''. An audience at a geek event is not actually consenting to view sexual material right then merely by virtue of having turned up to a talk advocating against censorship. |
||
| + | * a talk about sexual activities at, eg, a geeky sex expo |
||
| + | * a talk about censorship at which the speaker wants to show some examples of material that is liable to be censored |
||
| + | Some women-oriented or feminist examples might include: |
||
| − | The other special case is on a sex-focussed geek event, where obviously sexual content is appropriate. However in this case organisers and speakers should still alert their attendees to the kind of material expected, so that the audience can be reasonably considered to have had the chance to consent. It should be made clear that audience members may freely leave a talk or activity at any time and for any reason, and they should not be called upon to justify themselves. There also needs to be clear descriptions of what content or behaviour is ''not'' welcome and emphasis placed on being inclusive of different sexual orientations, preferences and practices. It is also useful to have some part of the event as a designated "chill out" space for people who don't want to participate in sexual activities or discussions at any given moment. |
||
| + | * talks about menstruation, contraception, reproductive politics, gender transitions or childbirth |
||
| + | However, such presentations should be made to a ''consenting'' audience. This means: |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| + | * make the expectation of sexual or confronting material clear to attendees in advance (this may be clear from the nature of the event, but if in doubt, explicit statements are better). |
||
| + | * make it clear that audience members may freely leave a talk or activity at any time and for any reason, and that they will not be called upon to explain or justify themselves. |
||
| + | * place emphasis on being inclusive of different sexual orientations and preferences. |
||
| + | * take extra care to emphasize what content or behaviour is ''not'' welcome (examples might include repeated sexual approaches, other harassment, hate speech) |
||
| + | * if the entire event is sexual in nature, have a designated "chill out" space for people who don't want to participate in sexual activities or discussions at any given moment. |
||
| + | In these environments, speakers will still wish to consider issues of [[Body image]] and [[Othering]] in choosing their content and imagery: for example, does it assume that the audience is all male and heterosexual? Does it show a range of body types, or only stereotypically attractive slender young able-bodied white folk? |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| − | === Forewarning speakers === |
||
| − | |||
| − | Gently warn your speakers about unwanted content before the event (probably at the same time you tell them about projector testing and similar things). You can say something like: |
||
| − | |||
| − | :[Event name] is an all-ages event and also welcomes people of different cultural backgrounds. As such, we ask speakers not to include sexual or suggestive content in their talk or slides, and to avoid any material targeting anyone on the basis of age, religion, race, gender, sexuality or ability. Session chairs will immediately end any presentation they judge to have included such material. |
||
| − | |||
| − | You might consider allowing any speaker who is concerned about this the opportunity to discuss it and review their talk with a program committee member. |
||
| − | |||
| − | === Reacting to inappropriate content === |
||
| − | |||
| − | The chair or most senior organiser or volunteer present in a room should immediately intervene in any presentation outside the agreed bounds. Audience members will very rarely feel any ability to respond until well after the presentation has concluded. |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| − | In the case of slides or similar containing inappropriate material, the presentation will almost certainly need to end: later content is likely to be inappropriate too, and it's unlikely the speaker is willing to or can edit the slides significantly. The chair should approach the speaker and turn off the projection of any inappropriate content. They should then inform the speaker that the talk needs to end, and finish by apologising to the audience. In cases where the speaker is genuinely contrite, they should be allowed to apologise also. |
||
| + | == Footnotes == |
||
| − | In the case of speech, the speaker is able to change their choice of words and could be warned with a simple "stop that please, it isn't appreciated!" Repeated problems may require that the talk end. |
||
| + | <references/> |
||
| + | [[Category:Issues]] |
||
| + | [[Category:Sexualized environment]] |
||
Latest revision as of 18:33, 10 April 2017
At Technical conferences, there are often presentations which contain suggestive or pornographic content, almost always featuring women. This is an example of a sexualized environment which can be unwelcoming to women.
It's not just women who are made uncomfortable, either. Child attendees and any accompanying adults may find this unwelcome (or frightening, depending on the content) too, and men often also for various reasons do not want to view sexual material. Anyone attending the event in a work context — geek technical conferences often have attendees who are only geeks on work time — will be unprepared for material that wouldn't be welcome when described in their work environment.
Examples
- Something at linux.conf.au ca. 2001(?)
- Debconf ftp-masters talk 2003
- Acme::Playmate talk, OSDC 2006
- Spock.com lingerie model incident, Web 2.0 Expo 2007
- SLUG Christmas card talk November 2008
- At Ignite:Velocity in Burlingame, CA in 2008, my talk on open data was bracketed by two porn talks --Skud 20:04, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
- CouchDB talk, Golden Gate Ruby Conference 2009
- Flashbelt slide show, Flashbelt 2009
- EMACS virgins joke, Gran Canaria Desktop Summit, 2009
- AmazonLISAFail
- Boxee Box Unveiling, 2009
- Casecamp boobies incident, 2010
- Benevolent dictator incident, Wikimania 2012
- CanSecWest security conference:
- Jan Krissler's presentation on biohacking, cropped porno gratuituously illustrating how hi-res photographs can be used to bypass retina scans.[1]
- Patrick Wardle (Synack) presentation, valid tech security terms sexualized with "relevant" images of women's body parts or sexual acts.
Discussion
Discussion of the general issue of sexualized presentations (discussion of specific incidents should be added to the corresponding page)
- The Porny Presentation Bingo Card (Skud's blog)
- The "controversy" continues
- Shedding Some Light on a Recent Trend
Justifications/excuses
This Porny Presentation Bingo Card has many examples of excuses
Common justifications for sexualised content in presentations include:
- He's just like that
- That the presenter was aiming for a strong Emotional response
- That the presentation was intended as humour
- That tech culture revels in being anti-establishment and unprofessional
- That there weren't any women in the audience anyway
- That if you didn't want to see it, you didn't have to attend
When is sexual material appropriate?
Some talks are about sexual or related topics, and in this case sexual material is appropriate. Some geek examples might include:
- a talk about sexual activities at, eg, a geeky sex expo
- a talk about censorship at which the speaker wants to show some examples of material that is liable to be censored
Some women-oriented or feminist examples might include:
- talks about menstruation, contraception, reproductive politics, gender transitions or childbirth
However, such presentations should be made to a consenting audience. This means:
- make the expectation of sexual or confronting material clear to attendees in advance (this may be clear from the nature of the event, but if in doubt, explicit statements are better).
- make it clear that audience members may freely leave a talk or activity at any time and for any reason, and that they will not be called upon to explain or justify themselves.
- place emphasis on being inclusive of different sexual orientations and preferences.
- take extra care to emphasize what content or behaviour is not welcome (examples might include repeated sexual approaches, other harassment, hate speech)
- if the entire event is sexual in nature, have a designated "chill out" space for people who don't want to participate in sexual activities or discussions at any given moment.
In these environments, speakers will still wish to consider issues of Body image and Othering in choosing their content and imagery: for example, does it assume that the audience is all male and heterosexual? Does it show a range of body types, or only stereotypically attractive slender young able-bodied white folk?